CrackedTuesday, March 29. 2005Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Thanks for the info, that is interesting. I’ll have to spend more time studying dried up mud puddles now!
Having just taken a “roll” of aerial photos on a flight from east to west coast I think it would be interesting to make an amateur aerial photo website. Tag them with lat/lon/elevation (if possible) and start weaving together a quilt of images.
I thought it was a frozen lake, and would not be surprised to see the tip of your shoe in the lower right corner;) Thanks for the “crack-fact”. I love to learn odd things.
You’re right, this really does look like a puddle. I never would have known what it really was if I hadn’t read what you’d written.
I also never knew that cracks intersect at 90 degree angles. Fascinating. Do you have any idea why that is?
Mmm, let’s guess. Cracks usually intersects as a “T” junction: a secondary crack collides with a pre-existing crack and in doing so turns to a 90 deg angle (cracks grow longer on the tip, which is the “cracking point” ). If the intersect angle is not 90 deg then one of the two sides of the secondary crack will be closer to the main crack. In that case the superficial tension (which is causing the crack to form) should be smaller on the side where the angle is obtuse (>90 deg, the side where the two cracks are farther away and the force can be distributed on a large area), and stronger where the angle is acute. The crack will grow in the way that tends to equilibrate the forces on the two sides, e.g. gradually reaching the 90 deg angle.
At first sight I though it was some kind of frozen puddle... It’s beautiful!
The 90 degree thing is very interesting. Makes me want to look for exceptions. Anyway I like the composition and the contrast of light and dark areas in the photo.
I live in Arizona and I’ve never seen it look like that
I love science! you have added a bit of relatively useless information to my brain and I thank you for that. I will never look at cracks in the same way again. nice photo by the way.
Whoa, that thing about the cracks is very cool. And useful to me as a student artist, if I ever want to portray cracking, to know that I should have the intersections like that to make them appear more natural.
I was fooled into thinking it was like 5 feet away when I first saw it- well spotted. This and the “erosion” geoabstract are phenominal. Add Comment
|
Calendar
QuicksearchCategoriesBlog Administration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||